Is Ebola an instrument of bio-terrorism?

President Jonathan called him ”a crazy man.” Was Patrick Sawyer really crazy for bringing Ebola to Nigeria? It all depends on how we look at his action and why.

If seen from a vengeful eye, this Liberian American could be seen to have poured his venom angry and frustrated on his ‘big brother’ Nigeria for his lack of sense of solidarity toward West African brother and neighbors battling the health and economic havoc caused by the Ebola epidemic.

Therefore, it’s possible he decided to us payback for our insensitivity to their plights; including not sending medical equipment, doctors or money in support its poor neighbors. If these were his reasons, no doubt, God was on his side for making us caught up unprepared.

Isn’t ironical and hypocritical that we are now demanding the so-called experimental drug from the US, who had too of it citizens contracting Ebola while in humanitarian mission in our Liberia? Besides, should America help its hegemonic rival in Africa, a nation that has since been seen by Washington to be opposing its imperial interests in Africa?

But if why Washington is refusing are simply because of these reasons, obviously the Ebola virus disease would soon me contained in Nigeria. Also if it is all about padding of bottom-line by some giant pharmaceutical companies, then, we should be so worried because whatever would be the price tag on the would-be the Ebola virus drug we are rich enough to bear it.

Because it is more complicated than our naked eyes can see, we should get ready for the road is going to be really potholed. Bumpy and complicated when our naked eyes are assisted with microscopic lens, which piercing the veneer, reveals that it is part of series of bio-terrorism on Africa in an effort to drastically curtail its fast growing population expected to reach two billion by 2050, to be led by Nigeria’s 500 million.

This understand that it’s all about curtailing Africa’s population will guide our understanding why someone somewhere seems determined to terrorize Africa with this bio-engineered lethal and expensive to cure disease. But to understand how old this population reduction project has been, we need to understand the genesis of western eugenics movement, started in the 1900s.

Recognizing Africans and Asians as ‘inferior’ and undesirable races that are threats to white, the so-assumed ‘superior’ race the father of the western eugenics movement, Sir Francis Galton, argued that for ”a more suitable race to continue to prevail over the less suitable races” the growth of the population of the unsuitable races should always be curtailed.

Alarmed by the kind of people behind this white supremacy project, Edwin Black in his famous book ‘War against the weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race,’ wrote, ”Eugenics would have been so much bizarre parlor talk had it not been for extensive financing by corporate philanthropies [from] the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Institution.”

That explains why Henry Kissinger, a long-running Rockefeller enabler produced in 1974 the infamous ‘National Security Study Memorandum 200’ (NSSM200) signed into law by President Gerald Ford in November 1975 as the official policy document handed to the State and Justice Departments along with the Pentagon and the CIA to fiercely pursue population reduction in developing countries, particularly in Africa.

Just like the earlier eugenics argument, the crusade to reduce the population of these countries, according to Kissinger, was to ensure that citizens of these countries never consume their very natural resources, supposedly meant for Americans and the preservation of western civilization.

Since involuntary sterilizations carried out by both the WHO and USAID yielded less expected results, in its ‘Global 2000 Report for the President in 1980,’ the State Department insisted that to drastically reduce the world population by two billion people by 2000 some deadly and expensive to cure or manage ”diseases” remained the best bet.

The deputy director for research and technology at the Department of Defense Dr. D.M. MacArthur, anticipating excited member of a subcommittee of the House Committee on Appropriation in a 1969 about these bio-engineered virus diseases, said they should ”differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms… for it might be refractory to the immunology and therapeutic process upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.”

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) were the two most lethal bio-engineered diseases in the US military-industrial-complex laboratories with their deployment targeted at developing countries people. Also leading US pharmaceutical companies the so-called ‘Big Pharm,’ were brought in to working out the processes of their release and possible cure once the required damage is completed.

HIV was released in 1975 by some unsuspecting WHO workers in Africa in doses of the smallpox vaccine, and later transmitted in hepatitis B vaccine. In 1976 while the first swine flu epidemic was hitting the world, the Ebola virus too was released through African monkeys.

By 1981 with everything ready to go as planned, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Maxwell Taylor confidently said, ”I have already written off more than a billion people. These people are in places in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.” Quick to agree, England’s Prince Philip talking to People magazine in an interview said, ”Human population growth is probably the single most serious that ….In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus.”

Confirming the man-made nature of HIV, Boyd Graves, a graduate of US Naval Academy and director ‘AIDS Concerns for Common Cause Medical Research Foundation, said, ”the United States intentionally made HIV/AIDS with the purpose for use as a population weapon; a quiet and silent holocaust of people of color, toward the development of a New World Order.”

Making sure no one stopped these deadly diseases from decimating the population of most developing countries, the CIA had to frustrated scientists carrying out research to find either an early cure or control their spread. Just the same way Raymond Rife was professionally discredited and financially ruined in the 1930s for wanting to put US medical community out of business with his cancer disease cure, using some unique radio-wave frequency vibrations, those wanting to find early cure for either HIV or EVD either died mysteriously or ruined financial and professionally.

By keeping most scientists and doctors away from looking closely at causes and remedies, it is understandable why there is yet a cure for Ebola except what the US authorities recently called ‘experimental drug’ which Washington now uses as its imperial carrot.

That the population reduction project has never been slowed, speaking on February 8, 2009 at the 45th Munich Conference on Security Policy, Obama’s National Security Adviser, Gen James L. Jones reassured his German audience that he takes his ”daily orders [not from President Obama but] but from Henry Kissinger,” who himself takes his ”orders from the New York corner dominated by the Rockefeller interests.”

Also that John Holdren, a militant member of the population control movement, who hardly hides his strongly belief in population reduction in regions like Africa at all costs should be sitting at Obama’s right hand as his science czar, only confirms how limited Obama’s power when it comes to matters like the US population reduction project.

With Ebola outbreak assuming pandemic proportion in Africa soon hundreds of millions of African child-bearing women will be sterilized along with their men counterparts. Deceived like the holocaust victims who were told that they were going into ‘shower’ for ‘public health’ and ‘disinfection,’ Africans, mandated by

their unsuspecting governments to get vaccinated against Ebola virus should end up casualties of involuntary sterilization.

How would Africans react years later when they discover that hundreds of millions of child-bearing Africans have been rendered infertile as a result of involuntary sterilization caused by an Ebola vaccine? What about discovering that while the vaccine stopped Ebola, its damaging effects included the destruction immune system, breeding of new form of diseases and cancer? Avoiding kind of had we known, will require African governments to insist on thorough investigation of the effective of such a vaccine and its potential health repercussions before handing Africans to western exterminators.

Written by
Odilim Enwegbara
Join the discussion