Why Iwu Failed

by Ugochukwu Ejinkeonye

On Saturday April 14, 2007, Prof Maurice Iwu and his “Independent” National Electoral Commission (INEC) went all out to shatter the expectations of Nigerians for orderly, free and fair elections in the country, by enthusiastically delivering to the nation a bundle of astounding failures and searing disappointments.

Despite the revolting chest-beating presently going on in INEC quarters and the (unsurprising) vulgar commendations emanating from the dark covens of the People Democratic Party (PDP), everyone now knows that Iwu and his INEC were simply unprepared or unwilling (or both) to take Nigerians beyond the usual sad, discomforting stories that had attended the past elections in the country, especially, in 1999 and 2003.

Indeed, last Saturday’s elections have been described as the worst in the history of the nation.The open and transparent rigging was simply unprecedented.

Obviously, INEC had another agenda, which it did not even attempt to hide. What Nigerians are therefore seeing as devastating failure is, in the skewed thinking of Iwu and his motley crowd at INEC, “an assignment well executed”. And if you look around you, you will see that those they unambiguously worked for are smothering them with superfluous praises, even in the face boundless failure, horrible malpractices and overwhelming gloom across the nation.

Iwu’s abysmal failure should come as a surprise to no one who had keenly observed the untoward path INEC had treaded with unqualified glee. For several months, the commission left its own job and preoccupied itself with what should not be its business. It allocated an unfair share of its time and resources to ensuring that candidates whose faces were not liked in Aso Rock were roughly shoved aside, so the anointed ones could smile home with unearned victory. At one point, (I think at it was at the Appellate Court), the presiding judge had to ask INEC what its business was in a case of disqualification of candidates.

Yet, the commission remained undeterred. Its loyalty, clearly, was not to the Nigerian people, but to a tiny cabal of unpatriotic characters who derive peculiar animation from seeing Nigeria remaining backward and chaotic.

Despite several court rulings stating clearly that INEC had no powers to disqualify candidates, Iwu had continued to speak and act as if disqualification of candidates was the only job INEC was set up to perform. In fact, the commission got itself so distracted with this thankless, extraneous job that little or no time was left for it to prepare for the elections.

Perhaps, that was part of the script, to deliberately make the elections to fail, so that the crises that might possibly follow would create an enabling environment for the resuscitation of the obnoxious Third Term agenda. But, unfortunately, as has become clear, the Third Term stuff will never find a fertile ground in Nigeria again. It is dead and buried, and so Iwu is left alone now in the quadrangle of shame, to grapple with the failure caused by lack of preparations and insincerity of purpose, and be soaked with all the bashings and public odium for the massive charade that took place last Saturday.

INEC’s obsession with the disqualification of candidates that stood in the way of Aso Rock’s anointed candidates was most pronounced in Anambra State, aside the obvious (prominent) Atiku case, which was pursued to a most ridiculous extent. While the commission eagerly accepted a court order it claimed was quietly served it by the Chekwas Okorie faction of the All Progressive Grand Alliance (APGA) to not accord recognition to the Victor Umeh-led faction of APGA (which had fielded the incumbent governor, Peter Obi, as its candidate), it blatantly refused to honour another court ruling which held that Dr. Chris Ngige, the former Governor of Anambra State, whose tenure Anambra people still remember with immense relish and refreshing nostalgia, is eligible to contest the gubernatorial elections.

By preferring one court ruling to the other, INEC was only betraying its desperation and doggedness to execute what looks like an unambiguous mandate from Aso Rock to ensure that all formidable oppositions in the race are shoved aside in order for “Dr” Andy Ubah, Aso Rock’s own candidate, to be imposed on Anambra people.

And now, that Igbo leaders of thought, under a better-focused and independent-minded Ohaneze-Ndigbo have made it clear that no election took place in Anambra, let’s see whether Iwu and his masters can afford to ignore them, or dream up another strategy to weather the challenge.

It does seem that Iwu’s troubles are increasing as his task becomes more complicated. Last Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that INEC lacks the power to disqualify candidates, and that Vice President Atiku Abubakar, whom the commission has deployed every energy and resources to hound out of the presidential race is eligible to contest.

Who now willIwu obey? The Supreme Court or his “Supreme leader” in Aso Rock? What is the implication of this ruling to the case of other candidates, which INEC stopped from contesting last Saturday’s elections? Is there nothing that could be legally done to redress the injustice meted out to them, by an electoral commission that cared less if unwanted and unworthy candidates are imposed on the people?

I think that further interpretation should be sought from the Supreme Court on the fate of these candidates. The Supreme Court must realize that the judiciary is fast acquitting itself as the only credible arm of government in Nigeria today, and so must save the people from the trauma of being governed by those they did not elect. By this ruling, the Supreme Court has endorsed the popular sentiment that the issue of disqualification candidates is so profound and strategic a matter to be left to the whims of an administrative body like INEC. Or else, we will continue to witness this kind of very repulsive abuse to which such a provision was subjected by the Obasanjo/Iwu mob!

By the way, I thought this was supposed to be a “computerized” election? So, why was the whole exercise dominated by papers, as of old? Why did it turn out that several people whose names had been fed into Iwu’s magic computers could not find their names in the badly arranged registers on election day?The names were not even arranged in alphabetical order. What kind of computers were incapable of doing something as simple as that? Sometimes, it took the poorly trained INEC officials a lot of time to find the names of voters. This caused so much frustrations.

In many places voting could not take place. Election materials in several cases arrived so late or did not at all. Many Nigerians were disenfranchised including Ikemba Nnewi, Dim Chukwuemeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu, Senate President, Ken Nnamani, Governor Peter Obi of Anambra State, Action Congress (AC) Vice Presidential Candidate, Edwin Umeh-Ezeoke, President-General of Ohaneze-Ndigbo, Dr. Dozie Ikedife, Emmanuel Ibeshi, AC Gubernatorial Candidate in Cross River State, and many others, because voting did not take place in their wards. INEC would have to look for better liars to try to convince us that this was not deliberate, to put some candidates at a disadvantage. So, in spite ofall the noise about INEC’s state of preparedness, this was what Nigerians got after all. So unfortunate.

You may also like

1 comment

Anonymous April 22, 2007 - 2:36 pm

Mr Ugochukwu Ejinkeonye, try to be fair. Are you saying that Anambra Election should be de-recognised but the election in Lagos State should stand despite the injustice to Jimi Agbaje and others? Should the candidate of the Ruling Party be declared just because INEC "had no choice" I looked in vain in your piece for a recommendation on the massive injustice to Hon Jimi Agbaje but all you did was critisize INEC like most critics do. No solution proposed. Well, the truth we must live with is that there was no election in Lagos State. The irregularities were so pervasive and the rigging brazen. The entire exercise in the State was a nullity! The election should be cancelled and a re-run arranged were a level playing ground will be created for ALL candidates. (AND PICTURES AND LOGO SHOWN ON THE BALLOT) That is the remedy needed for the injustice to Mr Agbaje (and others).

It simply does not make sense that INEC should clear every Tom Dick and Harry to contest election. For your information, INEC receives loads of Petition daily concerning candidates nominated for election. There was even a Presidential Candidate who had served a term of imprisonment in the U.S. but was fielded by a Political Party. Should INEC close its eyes to the citizens' Petition that exposed that candidate? Did that candidate also stand "in the way of Aso Rock"?

If Zik and Aminu Kano could be disqualified by the Electoral Commission in 1979 nobody can be too big if INEC has reason to. INEC is not a Rubber Stamp. Unpatriotic Nigerians with criminal antecedents hindered INEC by innundating it with vexatious and abusive litigations. Some sought injunctions a day to election just as was done in the 1993 Election that led to crisis. Rather than campaign, others chose to seek orders in court to stop or postpone the elections. Now that the elections are done there are those who seek to nullify it and scuttle DEMOCRACY just because they lost. Politicians introduced Violence NOT IWU. Politicians attacked INEC officials and Policemen in the course of their lawful duties. Politicians presented fake credentials. You are being unfair to Professor Iwu who left his plush job in America just like our lovely Okonjo-Iweala to lend a hand through this patriotic assignment. All blame cannot be laid on his door-step. He is not a Magician. If someone sits for an exam, he could score 10, 25, 90 or 100 per cent. The Professor would be wrong to say he did not sit for the exam just because he scored 10 per cent. Iwu did not score 100 per cent neither did he score 10. ALL STAKEHOLDERS deserve blame or praise NOT IWU alone. There are 36 States and IWU INEC has succeeded in about 30. That is what you, Mr Ejinkonye and your cohorts call failure.

As for the Presidential, Nigerians had to tolerate some democratic "nuisance" because some of the candidatures were just not viable.

The contest was clearly between General Muhammadu Buhari – a brutal ex- Military Dictator and the personable Governor Yar'ardua – a graduate of one of Nigeria's premier Universities. BOTH ARE FROM KATSINA STATE.

INEC could not stop anybody from contesting so there are many "candidates" but Nigeria's electoral will cannot be manifested outside the duo. INEC would have scored 100 per cent by declaring either. That would advance the nations progress and Iwu could not then be said to be a failure.

Reply

Leave a Comment