Lebanon: Destruction Beyond Comprehension

There are those who believe that the actions of a state in pursuit of its national security objectives can not be considered terrorism. Well, that is false! This line of reasoning is false because nation-states, in the pursuit of their national security interest do engage in terrorism, and commit war crimes. At the very least their actions do lead to the fanatical destruction of property, loss of life and the destruction of hope and prosperity. The FBI defines terrorism as the “unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.”

Sandler and Enders (1993) defined terrorism as the “premeditated use — or threatened use — of extranornal violence or force to gain a political objective through intimidation or fear.” Case in point is the current action of Israel against Lebanon, which, no matter how one looks at it — assuming one has an iota of sanity and humanity left — is nothing short of terrorism and criminality. The range and extent of brutality and destruction is beyond comprehension. Not even Adolph Hitler, at the height of his madness, could have dreamt up such physical destruction.

Charitably thinking, it is difficult not to think of Israel as America’s fifty-first state. Uncharitably, it is hard not to think of the US as Israel’s apron, an appendage; because whatever Israel wants, Israel gets; and whatever crime Israel commits, America would not consider it a crime. Charitably or uncharitably therefore, the State of Israel, in the end, would turn out to be America’s Achilles Heel. For no other country, save G7 countries and Russia, could have done what Israel is doing without stiff penalties. None!

History teaches that long before HAMAS and Hezbollah, there was the Irgun Zeva’I Le’umi (IRGUN), and the Lehi Group (aka Stern Gang), that were terrorist organizations that “holds no prisoner.” According to Britannica Online IRGUN “opposed the British and the Arabs; its activities included a 1946 attack on the King David Hotel, leaving 91 dead, and a 1947 raid on an Arab village in which all 254 inhabitants were killed.” History teaches too that virtually all of the past or current leadership of the State of Israel had/has blood on their hands; but today, they want to behave like choir boys and poster-boys for civility.

After sanctioning the destruction of Lebanon, and failing to call for a ceasefire, the United States is seeking financial donors to help rebuild the country. After sanctioning the destruction of Lebanon, the United States is readying herself to send in economic aid. Does this make sense to any right thinking human being? You destroy and now want to rebuild. But can the US give life and rebuild hope and trust? Generation after generation after generation will remember these iniquities and senselessness and ignominy on the part of Israel and the US. No one should forget. No one will forget!

Day after day and night after night Israel has been terrorizing toddlers, infants, pregnant women and scores of defenseless and innocent civilians — all because the Hezbollah killed one soldier and kidnapped two others. Why couldn’t the Israeli Defense Force limit its actions to military targets? Why didn’t the government of Prime Minister Olmert limit her destructive actions to Hezbollah? Why civilians and civilian infrastructures? As one watch events unfold, one gets the feeling that Hezbollah was baited; and that Tel Aviv’s actions are premeditated.

Now, where in the world are the other Arab countries in this matter? Where are they? Even the Arab League has outgrown its usefulness, and is now a tiger without claws. In any case, keen observers of the Middle East are not surprised that not a single Middle East country, save for Iran and Syria, seem concern or have offered any sort of help, be it overt or covert. Arab countries, have, in the last two to three decades been going soft, loosing their balls. Mostly, the region is now devoid of leaders. What we have, what we now have are mostly men wheezing around — scared of the United States. They jump and dance and scrawl whenever the US barks at them.

Latest Posts

Call Me Tony: A Parable of Corporate Nigeria

By Temitope Lakisokun The argument over the young trainee who...

Nigerian Style Of Football

We played the game. It entailed any number of...

Osun Election: Victory For The People

The result of the just-concluded governorship election in Osun...

What Happened To Nigeria’s $20 Billion?

Nigeria is subliminally going through perilous times. Unfortunately, the...

Don't miss

Nigerian Men and their Foreign Wives

Culturally, Nigerian men are overbearing, controlling, and paternalistic.  They relate to their fathers and mothers differently. They believe it is “a man’s world” and so they have the tendency to relegate women to subservient roles. I am stunned by the transformation Nigerian men, married to non-Nigerian women, have gone through in the United States...

Is Genevieve Nnaji Nigeria’s First Movie Superstar?

What is this Nnaji mystique that has her audience colliding heads so joyfully, crawling, craving some time in her sun? Star quality is what it is. The amount of talent dripping from her little finger is more than many of our other female leading ladies have combined...

Why Do African Men Go Home to Marry?

The African male is perplexing. He can be enigmatic. He can be everything and sometimes, nothing. He can be sweet and loving and caring and benevolent and at the same time oppressive. His life is full of contradictions. In so many ways, he is a wounded animal as a result of his historical past...

Mobil’s Oily Battle Over Intellectual Property Rights

The eight-year long battle between Commandclem Nigeria Limited and Mobil Producing Nigeria Limited, over ownership of patent and intellectual rights to a chemical invention for offshore drilling seems in sight…

Lost in a Sea of Hair Weaves

One can understand some black women wearing wigs for the same reasons that some white women do; because they are losing or have lost their hair. One can even make allowances for wigs being worn for the occasional change of look. But how to explain young women with full heads of hair who will never be seen dead with their natural hair?
Sabella Ogbobode Abidde
Sabella Ogbobode Abidde
Please, do not ask me about religion. I get the evil look every time I tell people I am an agnostic who teeters on atheism. My world resolves around ethics and the rule of law. That’s it. I have no use for religion: religious convictions are not part of my existence -- the laws of man are good enough for me. I have lived in several cities: Seattle, Miami, Norman, Minneapolis-Saint Paul, Saint Cloud, the District of Columbia, Houston, and Mankato. I am not sure where I am going to live next. And I have never really had a profession, only jobs: been a cook, a dishwasher, a civil servant, house cleaner, university instructor and researcher and so on and so forth. Every so often I get questions concerning the role and place of the African woman. Well, I don’t know; at least not with any certainty. What seems to work best is when both partners work as a team: cooperate, coordinate and collaborate their marital efforts. And they should be mindful of the insidious effect of modernization on the African family.

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here